Thursday 31 July 2014

Could bulk-buying save NHS pounds?


Surgical gloves

Could there be a better deal on gloves?

Would it be better if the NHS bought in bulk?


That’s the question that has arisen since I wrote about how the health service procures essentials like surgical gloves and incontinence pads.


My piece followed the government initiative to publicise the huge variation in prices paid for supplies in different parts of the NHS.


And it has raised a number of questions.


Perhaps the most important is – how could health chiefs do better?


Tens of millions could be wasted by the failure to drive a hard bargain with suppliers.


But getting a better deal for clinical waste disposal bags, surgical gloves and even A4 paper might not be as easy as it looks.


Some take the view that criticism of procurement practices is another example of “NHS bashing” – after all, they argue, the NHS was recently rated as the most efficient healthcare system amongst several leading economies by a major think tanks.


More clout?


Money doctor

It has been suggested millions could be saved by buying in bulk

Others who have worked at various levels of the NHS say they are immensely frustrated by the waste and inefficiency they see day to day.


One leading trust chief executive told me that lecturing health staff on the need to save money resulted in eyes glazing over.


But explaining that every pound saved would be reallocated to front line services and enable better outcomes for patients was an easy message to sell.


Managements, though, clearly have to demonstrate their own competence in cutting costs by better procurement.


Central government – or the top level of NHS England – would have immense clout and buying power.


The idea of Whitehall involvement was dismissed as impractical by some.


However, it’s already happening.


The Department of Health is working with NHS England to negotiate central deals for 100 items.


A list of agreed prices and suppliers will be sent to trusts in the autumn.


If deals for drugs for the NHS can be handled at national level, why not do the same for some other products?


Hidden costs?The Home Office is currently looking at haggling out a central deal for police uniforms with a small group of suppliers.


Police authorities in England would then get the benefit of the lower prices.


The same things is being considered for fire service uniforms – its estimated that £18m could be lopped off an annual budget of £127m.


Centrally negotiated supply contracts will not always be appropriate.



It matters so much because millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money is at stake.”



Regional groups of NHS trusts might pool their procurement to get better prices.


This has been successfully applied in the capital with the NHS London Procurement Partnership (LPP).


Established in 2006, the group says it has saved more than £650m on behalf of members.


One trust is said to be saving nearly £120,000 this year alone on screws used in spinal surgery by getting a deal through LPP rather than trying to negotiate alone with a supplier.


‘Own way best’ mentalitySome health experts are sceptical about centralised procurement.


The former health trust chief Roy Lilley, now a commentator, says because of hidden distribution costs.


He says: “The more you buy the more expensive it is by the time you get to the end user”.


He believes it would easier to tell trusts that non-medical suppliers should never account for more than a set proportion of turnover and let them get on with it.


Those who believe strongly in the merits of smarter procurement acknowledge that applying it in Whitehall is not straightforward.


Alastair McKie, of PA Consulting Group which advises some government departments, says: “It takes a lot of motivated individuals who can share their experiences across different departments to make things happen.”


He says that individual organisations, for example NHS trusts, often believe their way of doing things is best and need a lot convincing to join forces with others.


The NHS supply chain sounds a dry and specialist subject.


But it matters so much because millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money is at stake.


At a time of a squeeze on public funding, the imperative to make better use of that money is as urgent as ever.


Hugh Pym


Article written by Hugh Pym Hugh Pym Health editor




Source BBC News/Health http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-28490572


Could bulk-buying save NHS pounds?

Wednesday 30 July 2014

PMCPA looks to app to simplify the APBI Code of Practice

Code regulator takes ‘digitally-led’ approach in partnership with The Earthworks


Digital pharma marketing blogThe UK’s Code of Practice regulator is turning to digital technology for a strategic communications programme that will see it launch a new app to simplify the ABPI Code next year.


The PMCPA, which administers the Code, will work with Marlow-based agency The Earthworks to create a strategic communications programme that will also include content marketing on the PMCPA’s website and through social media channels.


Vicky Bewer, head of communications at the PMCPA, said: “We are excited about the PMCPA becoming more active in the digital space, with The EarthWorks helping us maximise social media and the quality content we already have.”


The PMCPA has often struggled with its online presence, so anything that can raise its digital game will likely be welcomed by its stakeholders.


Scheduled for a 2015 launch, the PMCPA’s planned iOS app for Apple devices will allow users to navigate and simplify the new Code, with semantic search functionality that displays appropriate commentary and relevant cases.


PMCPA director Heather Simmonds said: “We are really keen to engage with our customers in a more effective way and look forward to doing this in partnership with The EarthWorks.


“The app is a great opportunity to allow users to interrogate the code in a simpler user-friendly way.”


The programme will also see the PMCPA work with other organisations, including online physician community Doctors.net.uk, media agency MSA Media and the PM Society.


There will be a key focus on benchmarking and research to assess perception of the PMCPA amongst their key stakeholders.


Alex Butler, joint managing director at The EarthWorks, said: “I have always associated the PMCPA with upholding the highest standards of ethics and good practice in pharmaceuticals; something definitely not at odds with innovation, but in fact underpinning and supporting best practice.


“We are proud to have been chosen to work with them and believe they will add even greater value to the healthcare community through the development of an exciting new communications strategy over the coming years.”


Through the new partnership The Earthworks will be promoting a strong and positive profile for the PMCPA’s work in relation to the Code and helping build awareness of, and promote, the benefits of self-regulation to the industry, health professionals, patients and the public.


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/blogs/digital_intelligence/archive/2014/july/new_app_will_aim_to_simplify_apbi_code_of_practice




PMCPA looks to app to simplify the APBI Code of Practice

Tuesday 29 July 2014

ABPI and BIA to support understanding of biosimilars

Trade bodies work together on communication materials for prescribers

ABPI London officesThe two leading UK trade bodies for the life sciences industry have published new materials to help healthcare professionals understand biosimilar medicines.

The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) and the Bioindustry Association (BIA) produced the documents in response to the growing importance of biosimilars, which are copies of biological drugs.


For 2013 the global value of biosimilars was over $2.4bn, according to market research specialists Visiongain, while over the next five years they are on track to grow to $23bn, based on an analysis by Frost & Sullivan. This growth is to be driven by the patent expiries of major biological products such as Sanofi’s insulin Lantus, with Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim partnering on a copy called Abasria.


The ABPI and the BIA said they aimed to address frequently asked questions from healthcare professionals who may not know the full facts about biosimilar medicines.


Highlights include that since 2006, more than 18 branded biosimilar medicines have been granted marketing authorisations in the EU and that biosimilars are expected to enter a much wider range of therapy areas, including rheumatoid arthritis, oncology and diabetes.


The ABPI and the BIA also recommend that all biological medicines, including biosimilar medicines, should be prescribed by brand name and not by the name of the active ingredient – an issue that has caused much debate in the US.


ABPI director of value and access, Paul Catchpole, said: “A number of ABPI and BIA members are developing biosimilar medicines and we are therefore building relationships with key stakeholders to improve understanding of biological medicines, including biosimilar medicines.”


“These new informative materials will assist in ensuring that these medicines are well understood and used appropriately for the benefit of all eligible NHS patients.”


BIA chief executive officer Steve Bates said of the new materials: “We hope that they will assist healthcare professionals in particular to be aware of, and better understand the challenges of, the introduction of biosimilar medicines to the NHS.”


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/abpi_and_bia_to_support_understanding_of_biosimilars_587908




ABPI and BIA to support understanding of biosimilars

Monday 28 July 2014

Digitally-native HCPs; Key data on the how doctors' use of digital is changing

The way doctors use digital technology is changing, and there will soon be more ‘digitally-native’ healthcare professionals than those who have had to adapt to new technologies.


This infographic compiled by LBi Health and originally published in The Directory contains key details on how doctors are using digital.


Read the LBi Health article ‘Are you talking to digital natives?’


Digitally-native HCPs body


 Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_intelligence/infographic_digitally-native_hcps_544275



Digitally-native HCPs; Key data on the how doctors' use of digital is changing

Friday 25 July 2014

Antimicrobial resistance priority for new UK science minister

Greg Clark announces collaboration led by Medical Research Council


UK flagThe UK is planning a multi-pronged approach to tackle a growing threat of resistance to antibiotic drugs that is expected to see current treatments become useless within the next two decades.


In his first announcement as science minister Greg Clark said that all seven UK research councils will work together on a strategy to address the many and varied issues related to antimicrobial resistance.


“The united strategy announced today will provide a more coordinated approach to research gathering by bringing together leading cross-industry experts against what is one of today’s greatest scientific problems,” said Clark, who replaced David Willetts in Prime Minister David Cameron’s recent reshuffle.


Led by the Medical Research Council (MRC) the cross-council initiative will apply to medical researchers, biologists, engineers, vets, economists, social scientists, mathematicians and even designers.


According to the MRC, the UK alone has spent £275m on researching the issue since 2007 but “no effective solutions have been found”.


The problems extend beyond antibiotic treatments for diseases – antimicrobial resistance affects livestock infected with bacteria. Little is known about how human and animal resistance is related and the initiative will work to identify common characteristics in both humans and in farm and wild animals in order to find new drugs.


Scientists will also investigate how to track the extent of antimicrobial resistance in different environments, such as the sea, rivers, air, soil and in organisms, as well as in food, homes and hospitals.


In addition to the MRC the collaboration will include the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC).


The announcement follows the recent launch of a UK review into the research environment for companies working in antibiotic development and advise to healthcare professionals to limit the use of antibiotics to curb resistance problems.


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/antimicrobial_resistance_priority_for_new_uk_science_minister_586309




Antimicrobial resistance priority for new UK science minister

Thursday 24 July 2014

Community pharmacies central to diabetes fight in UK

Risk assessments can help identify people at risk of developing condition

diabetes uk boots risk assessmentConducting risk assessments in community pharmacies can help to identify significant numbers of people at risk of type 2 diabetes in the UK, according to a new report.

The research, conducted by the University of East Anglia with support from Boots UK and Diabetes UK, analysed the outcomes of patients accessing the Diabetes UK Type 2 risk assessment available in Boots UK stores following its launch in January 2013.


According to the report, which was published online in the journal International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, the risk assessments identified that 29 per cent of people who took part were at risk of developing type 2 diabetes in the next decade.


More than 21,000 risk assessments were carried out between the beginning of January 2013 and the end of September 2013, in 1,513 Boots UK pharmacies. The analysis pooled data from 3,513 of these assessments.


Boots UK director of pharmacy Peter Bainbridge commented on the potential for pharmacies to help tackle the growing burden of diabetes for the NHS.


“The research shows the assessments our pharmacy teams perform on a daily basis play an important role in supporting early detection, so patients can take steps to prevent or take control of the condition sooner,” he said.


“As the prevention and management of long term conditions such as diabetes continues to dominate the public health agenda, this research demonstrates the overall value community pharmacy can offer, providing convenient access to healthcare support and reducing the strain on the NHS.”


The importance of accessible diabetes risk assessments was echoed by Dr Richard Brice, chairman of Whitstable Medical Practice.


“All the evidence tells us that the earlier we detect diabetes, the easier and more effective the treatments are. Hence I’m all in favour of easy and accessible, evidence based risk assessment programmes,” he said.


Simon O’Neill, Director of Health Intelligence and Professional Liaison at Diabetes UK, said: “It is great that risk assessments for type 2 diabetes are now available on the high street as it is really important that as many of these people get a risk assessment so that if they are at high risk they can start getting the help they need to reduce their risk, while if they have undiagnosed type 2 they can start getting the support that can help get it under control.


“I would urge people to have their risk assessed if they are overweight, over 40, or over 25 if they are from a South Asian background, or have a close relative with diabetes.”


An online version of the diabetes risk assessment is available on Boots’ website.


The findings fit neatly with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society’s plans for bringing pharmacy centre-stage, as outlined in its Now or Never: shaping pharmacy for the future report, published at the end of last year.


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/community_pharmacies_central_to_diabetes_fight_in_uk_588382




Community pharmacies central to diabetes fight in UK

Wednesday 23 July 2014

Pharma firms open up drug libraries to UK researchers

AZ, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda and UCB partner with Medical Research Council

UK flagThe UK’s Medical Research Council (MRC) has stepped up its collaboration with industry via a new agreement that will provide access to compound libraries from seven pharma companies.

The agreement with AstraZeneca (AZ), GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Janssen R&D, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda and UCB gives UK researchers access to a ‘virtual library’ of molecules, all of which have undergone some degree of development but are currently lying idle.


Typically, the “deprioritised” compounds failed to show sufficient activity against drug targets but “may still be useful against other diseases with shared biological pathways,” according to the MRC.


The new initiative draws on the experience of an ongoing collaboration between the MRC and AZ, which has involved compound library access since 2011 and was recently expanded to include the establishment of a joint, public-private screening facility at the pharma company’s R&D campus in Cambridge.


The earlier compound-sharing initiative has already shown that academic researchers can find value in projects discontinued by pharma companies and “re-purpose” them for new indications. For example, clinical trials are now underway in Manchester to see whether an AZ drug designed originally to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux disease can be used to treat chronic cough.


Moreover, as the compounds have already undergone preliminary development such as safety testing, any new treatments arising from the research could reach patients more quickly. A full list of available compounds will be published later this year, when UK scientists will be able to apply for MRC funding to use them in academic research projects.


The alliance with AZ has already resulted in £7m-worth ($12m) of funding awarded by the MRC to research projects in the areas of Alzheimer’s, cancer and rare diseases, said Prof Sir John Savill, chief executive of the research organisation.


“By funding studies using these compounds, which otherwise would not be carried out, we will enable scientific breakthroughs that will improve the health of patients in the UK and worldwide,” he added.


The expansion of the initiative is yet another example of a shift towards collaborative R&D in pharma, with drugmakers increasingly trying to forge ties with external researchers.


GSK has taken the approach of running a drug hunter competition, while Janssen’s parent Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has started setting up partnering units in close proximity to biomedical R&D hubs to tap into emerging projects and provide expertise and funding.


Meanwhile, last month the MRC and several UK universities joined with AZ, GSK and J&J – alongside a number of smaller companies – to launch a £16m dementia research programme, which aims to develop ways to detect people at risk of developing dementia as early as possible, improve therapy and ultimately find ways to prevent the disease.


Commenting on the latest announcement, Stephen Whitehead, chief executive of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), said it represents “a fantastic example of open innovation that benefits both industry and academia.”


“The ABPI and our members are committed to greater collaboration with UK researchers and the whole of the academic community to improve our understanding of diseases so that we can continue to develop life-changing medicines for the benefit of patients,” he added.


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/pharma_firms_open_up_drug_libraries_to_uk_researchers_588073




Pharma firms open up drug libraries to UK researchers

Tuesday 22 July 2014

Clinical study potential for electronic health records

But red tape still needs to be reduced if trials are to be simplified


Clinical study potential for electronic health recordsElectronic health records have the potential to streamline the clinical trials process and reduce costs but still face too much red tape, according to a new study.


Researchers using the UK’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) recruited patients for two trials, one comparing two statins and another looking at the use of antibiotics in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).


The team was led by Professor van Staa, then a member of the CPRD and now based at The University of Manchester’s Health eResearch Centre. They installed a new computer programme in 23 approved GP surgeries across England and Scotland that allowed doctors to confidentially identify patients eligible for the trial and sign them up at the click of a button – saving time and money.


The researchers then used patients’ electronic health records, as recorded in the CPRD and updated as part of their regular medical appointments, to monitor the impact of the treatments they had been prescribed.


Prof van Staa said: “The use of electronic health records in simplifying clinical trials means that we no longer need to remain uncertain about which medicine offers the best health benefits for patients.


“This study shows that scientists are able to conduct research which will highlight which treatment is best for patients.”


In the Retropro trial 300 patients with a high risk of cardiovascular disease were randomised between simvastatin (the generic form of MSD’s Zocor) and atovastatin (the generic form of Pfizer’s Lipitor). The second study – eLung – compared immediate antibiotics against deferred or non-use in patient with COPD.


Together the studies found research could be conducted with minimal impact on the lives of the patients who, after giving consent, needn’t any active involvement in the process.


However, although the statin trial recruited all its required patients, eLung only managed one-fifth of its 150-patient target and Good Clinical Practice guidelines, governance and consent procedures were found to have substantially complicated the trials.


The researchers concluded that trials using electronic health records (EHR) could successfully be used for clinical trials, but that the complexity of the approvals process for studies remains a major challenge.


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/blogs/digital_intelligence/archive/2014/july/clinical_study_potential_for_electronic_health_records




Clinical study potential for electronic health records

Monday 21 July 2014

Social media 'fuel rise in complaints against doctors'

Taking a blood pressure reading

A rise in complaints against doctors reflects the role of social media and negative press coverage of the medical profession, according to a report commissioned by the General Medical Council.


Complaints by the public against doctors doubled between 2007 and 2012.


A research team from Plymouth University was asked to investigate the increase.


The GMC said there was no evidence of falling standards in the profession.


The report does not point to any specific cause for the rise in complaints made by the general public.


They went up from 5,168 complaints in 2007 to 10,347 five years later.



We have no evidence that the rise in complaints against doctors reflects falling standards”


Niall Dickson GMC chief executive


Instead, it identified a number of trends that it says have made the public more prone to making complaints about their doctors.


The report said patients are now better informed about their health, have higher expectations of doctors and tend to treat them with less deference than they used to.


It said social media also had a role to play in the rise in complaints because it encouraged people to discuss their experiences of the medical profession in public forums and allowed information to be more easily accessed and shared.


Negative press coverage could be “chipping away” at the medical profession’s reputation, the report said, resulting in more people making “me too” complaints to the GMC.


‘Changes in society’


But while media coverage of high-profile medical cases may have influenced the rise in complaints, it suggested this also gave rise to more complaints that were not relevant to the GMC, which regulates doctors in the UK.


Dr Julian Archer, lead author of the report from Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, said the report had produced “some fascinating findings”.


He said: “They show that the forces behind a rise in complaints against doctors are hugely complex and reflect a combination of increased public awareness, media influence, the role of social media technology and wider changes in society.”


Dr Archer added: “The report also indicated that there is much to do to improve the wider complaint handling system, so that complaints made by the general public about their doctors are directed to the appropriate authorities.”


Niall Dickson, chief executive of the GMC, said the research showed that patients were more willing to complain and found it easier to do so.


But he said: “We have no evidence that the rise in complaints against doctors reflects falling standards.”


He agreed that the complaints system itself could be improved.


“The challenge for the GMC and other organisations is to make sure that anyone who has a concern or complaint can find their way to the right organisation to deal with it. For the vast majority of patients and relatives, that will mean local resolution.


“The large number of complaints we receive that are not for us suggests that the current system is not working as well as it should.”


Source BBC News/Health http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-28368216



Social media 'fuel rise in complaints against doctors'

Friday 18 July 2014

A&E waiting target 'missed for whole year'

A&E department

England’s major A&E units have now missed the waiting time target for 52 weeks in a row, official figures show.


Hospitals are meant to see 95% of patients who arrive at A&E in four hours.


But the last time the 144 trusts with major units met that over a seven-day period was in the week ending 14 July last year.


This contrasts to previous years when the target has been met during some of the warmer months.


However, NHS England officially measures the four-hour target on a three-monthly cycle and includes smaller units, such as walk-in centres, in the total.


By that measure, the target has been met over the past year.


But the weekly picture in the major units is another sign of how pressure is still bubbling away in the system despite it being summer.


Extra funds


The latest weekly statistics, released by NHS England on Friday, take in the week ending 13 July. They once again show performance is below the 95% mark.


Patients in a hospital waiting room

The number of visits to A&E units have been rising for a number of years. There were over 14.2m attendances last year – up 1.4% in two years.


But a bigger proportional rise has been seen in the number of these visits that end up with people being admitted into hospital. These tend to be the most complex cases that take the most time to deal with.


Of the 14.2m visits last year, just under 3.8m ended up with an admission into the hospital. That is 5.7% higher than two years previously.


Dr Cliff Mann, of the College of Emergency Medicine, said: “A lot of this is related to the ageing population and while the percentage rise may seem small we are still talking about a lot of people.


“We have a drastic shortage of doctors and that is hampering out ability to cope with rises in demand.


“We have to make the speciality more attractive.”


The college has also called for measures to relieve the pressure on A&Es, including stationing GPs at units to deal with the less serious cases.


Patients Association chief executive Katherine Murphy said: “We are increasingly hearing from patients about problems at A&E. It used to be just a winter phenomenon, but this shows it has become an issue all-year round.”


She said she thought problems accessing GPs was a major factor.


Sarah Pinto-Duschinsky, of NHS England, said once the smaller units, such as walk-in centres, were taken into account the NHS was doing well and meeting the 95% mark.


“We are determined to maintain these high standards despite the pressure the NHS is under. NHS staff should be given the credit they deserve.”


Source BBC News http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-28355990



A&E waiting target 'missed for whole year'

Thursday 17 July 2014

Online marketing increasingly effective for pharma

comScore report shows branded sites can impact medicine usage


Online direct-to-consumer marketing continues to remain an effective option for pharma companies, according to a new study.


The Eighth Annual Online Marketing Effectiveness Benchmarks for the Pharmaceutical Industry report published by comScore Health Solutions demonstrated that pharma online advertising has the highest viewability rates of ten industries benchmarked by the researchers, with 51 per cent of billions of advertisements assessed found to be ‘viewable’. Other industries measured included travel, consumer goods and media/entertainment.


This is important as viewability – the degree to which an advertisement is actually seen by a consumer – has a large impact on the effectiveness of an advertising campaign. In this case viewability is definite as 50 per cent or more the advertisement appearing in the viewable frame of the web browser for at least one second.


Online Display Advertisement Viewability

Source: comScore vCE Benchmarks, Q4 2013


comscore body


Click image for a larger version


A driving force for the continued growth of online advertising is new technology, with the report finding that consumers are turning to new platforms, such as mobile devices, to consume health-related content.


Despite concerns that brand sites might be an increasingly archaic form of marketing, comScore was able to show that these sites “provide sizeable lifts in both brand awareness and favorability”. This was particular true in terms of patient adherence; among patients who visited a branded website, there was a 14.7-point lift above a control group in terms of prescription refill activity.


“The importance of pharmaceutical branded websites continues to be high. Our research shows that regardless of how condition sufferers get to the site, that visit has a significant influence in those patients seeking treatment,” said John Mangano, VP, comScore Health Solutions.


“Marketers should also take note of what devices consumers are using to engage with health-related content, as visitation to the category via mobile devices has increased by 36 per cent in just the past year”.


Mangano added that understanding how to reach consumers effectively through platforms such as mobile will help companies create better marketing and content strategies, whether they are targeting patients or prospects.


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/online_marketing_increasingly_effective_for_pharma_586284




Online marketing increasingly effective for pharma

Wednesday 16 July 2014

Novartis buys rights to Google's 'smart lens' technology

Pharma company’s eye unit Alcon will focus on uses in diabetes and presbyopia


Google Novartis Alcon smart lens


Novartis has licensed Google’s new ‘smart lens’ technology in a deal that will see its eye health unit Alcon work with the technology company develop new types of contact lenses.


The technology combines non-invasive sensors, microchips and other miniaturised electronics which are so small they resemble bits of glitter embedded within contact lenses.


Google revealed earlier this year it was testing smart contact lens that can measure diabetes patients’ glucose levels via their tears and connect wirelessly with a mobile device to store this information.


Applying the minimally invasive technology within the diabetes arena to reduce the burden of regular blood glucose tests is one of the key areas of interest for Novartis in its new deal with Google.


The other is to help people with presbyopia – age-related long-sightedness that makes it more difficult to focus on objects that are near.


Novartis hopes people with presbyopia who can no longer read without glasses could benefit from a smart lens, either in the form of an accommodative contact lens or an intraocular lens, to help restore the eye’s natural autofocus as part of refractive cataract treatment.


Google Novartis Alcon smart lens health


Beyond these two areas other applications may yet be forthcoming and Novartis has licensed ‘all ocular medical uses’ of Google smart lens technology.


Novartis CEO Joseph Jimenez said: “We are looking forward to working with Google to bring together their advanced technology and our extensive knowledge of biology to meet unmet medical needs.


“This is a key step for us to go beyond the confines of traditional disease management, starting with the eye.”


For Jimenez’s company the deal between Alcon and the Google[x] team – which is tasked with finding new solutions to major global problems – fits into Novartis’ plans to “evolve technology to manage human diseases and conditions”, where its initiatives include a recently tie-up with quantified self firm TicTrac.


Sergey Brin, co-founder of Google, said: “Our dream is to use the latest technology in the miniaturisation of electronics to help improve the quality of life for millions of people. We are very excited to work with Novartis to make this dream come true.”


The agreement, which remains subject to anti-trust approvals, would also allow Google to avoid having to deal with some of the “painful regulation” Brin sees in the health tech space.


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/blogs/digital_intelligence/archive/2014/july/novartis_buys_rights_to_googles_smart_lens_technology




Novartis buys rights to Google's 'smart lens' technology

Friday 11 July 2014

Samsung incentivises African mHealth project with music

Will also offer discounted handsets and tablets to consumers and health workers


Mobile health mHealthIs music the way to better health? That is one of the questions brought to mind by a new mHealth project that aims to improve maternal and child health across sub-Saharan Africa.


The project’s partners include Samsung, which will offer participants access to the ‘Samsung ecosystem’ of music, video and other value-added services “to be used as an incentive to drive health usage”.  The electronics giant will also offer discounted Samsung handsets and tablets to consumers and health workers across Africa.


Thabiet Allie, head of content and services at Samsung Electronics Africa, said: “Healthcare in Africa has benefited greatly from advancements in mobile technology. Simultaneously, the healthcare industry is moving towards a delivery model that is more patient-centered, value-based and accessible in even remote environments.


“In this regard, Samsung is perfectly positioned to add value to this digital evolution in healthcare, as our devices are both at the cutting edge of innovation and available widely across the continent.”


Smart Health, digital security and diagnostics


Coming together under the auspices of mobile operators’ association the GSMA, the mHealth partnership’s other initial partners include digital security firm Gemalto, South African-based telephone helpline Hello Doctor and mobile data collection firm Mobenzi and they will work together to provide a range of mHealth services to women and children, with a particular focus on nutrition.


The project will jointly launch services in seven countries – Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia – from September 2014, and next year hopes to additional partners and services. There are also plans to expand the collaboration to four more countries: Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania.


Ultimately the aim is to increase access to health care for vulnerable women and children across Africa, while providing delivery mechanisms for mHealth services that are commercially sustainable and scalable.


Telecoms company MTN, also one of the project’s partners, will ensure access to a Smart Health application that provides health content, health registration and data collection services.


Meanwhile another of the partners, Scotland’s Omega Diagnostics has pledged to make its Visitect HIV CD4 point of care test more affordable and accessible via mobile integration.


Andrew Shepherd, founder and managing director at Omega Diagnostics, said: “Current lab based static diagnostics tools are unable to meet growing patients’ needs as countries step up their HIV treatment programs in conjunction with the decentralisation of CD4 testing.


“Multi-layer partnerships for mHealth smartphone applications are poised to become an essential foundation in the bridge to augment the continuum of care to the neediest patients, whilst also providing management information and real time surveillance data.”


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/blogs/digital_intelligence/archive/2014/july/samsung_incentivizes_african_mhealth_project_with_music




Samsung incentivises African mHealth project with music

Wednesday 9 July 2014

UK healthcare professionals urged to say 'no' to antibiotics

Royal Colleges issues joint statement to members warning of antimicrobial resistance


UK flagUK healthcare professionals have been urged by their representative bodies to say ‘no’ to patients who ask for antibiotics for minor illnesses.


Several Royal Colleges and the UK Faculty of Public Health released a joint statement today warning doctors, nurses and pharmacists that the current ‘better safe than sorry’ approach to prescribing antibiotics is no longer effective considering the threat of antimicrobial resistance.


According to the organisations, which include the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), the Royal College of Physicians (RCP), the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) and the Royal College of Nursing (RCN), a “radical new approach” is needed if antibiotics are to remain effective.


As part of this, frontline healthcare professionals have been told to resist pressure from patients for unnecessary prescriptions and to explore alternative treatment options.


The statement also calls for doctors, nurses and pharmacists to take personal responsibility for re-educating the public about the consequences that can result if antibiotics are over-used or misused.


Phil Howard, consultant pharmacist in antimicrobials from the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, said: “If we are still to have effective antibiotics in 20 years time, the public and healthcare professionals need to change their attitude to antibiotics now.


“We need to develop a culture of self-care that minimises infection risks through better hygiene, having recommended vaccination, and only resorting to antibiotics for treating serious infections,” he added.


Specific recommendations include improving the monitoring of prescriptions for antibiotics, introducing a minimum dosage and mandating the labelling of foods that use antibiotics.


The statement comes the week after UK Prime Minister David Cameron warned of the threat of resistance to antibiotics and called for a review of the economic issues surrounding research to encourage the development of new medicines.


The urgent need to revise the way the antibiotics are used also led to the £10m Longitude Prize being awarded to a diagnostic tool for bacterial infections, while a campaign to encourage alternatives to antibiotics was rewarded at the recent Communiqué Awards 2014.


Following the joint statement from the professional bodies, a national summit for pharmacists, doctors, nurses and public health professionals will be held on November 6, 2014 to look at how they can work together, and with patients, to tackle antibiotic resistance.


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/uk_healthcare_professionals_urged_to_say_no_to_antibiotics_583817




UK healthcare professionals urged to say 'no' to antibiotics

Tuesday 8 July 2014

UK NHS needs to rethink long-term care

MPs call for system change as chronic conditions account for 70 per cent of yearly healthcare spend

NHS England logo

An advisory committee to the UK Government has called for an overhaul to the healthcare system to better support people with long-term conditions.The House of Commons Health Committee published a report last week that claims 70 per cent of annual NHS expenditure in England in spent on managing long-term conditions, such as diabetes, arthritis and asthma.

The Committee reported that demographic and cost pressures on the NHS from patients with long-term conditions will increase in the coming years, with one projection estimating that the bill for treatment of long-term conditions will require the NHS to find £4bn more each year by 2016.


Compounding this is the increasing prevalence of comorbidities, where patients live with two or more long-term conditions, complicating treatment and adding to its cost. According to the Committee, these multimorbidities are not adequately recognised in a system set up to address single diseases – a thought backed up by David Haslam, chair of NICE.


The Committee recommended that definitions should be reviewed and approaches changed to emphasise the importance of treating the person, not the condition.


The report also supports the integration of the health and social care system, in order to provide better and more effective care for people with long-term conditions. Greater integration within the NHS is needed to coordinate treatments, streamline care and ensure that patients with complex requirements are not passed from pillar to post.


Individual care planning for people with long-term conditions is needed, based on the principles demonstrated in the NHS House of Care programme. Patients will get a greater say in their treatment and will be able to discuss what works best for them.


The Committee also looked at the prevailing view that services to treat long-term conditions should be moved out of hospitals and into primary and community care, and found that, while such changes might lead to more effective care, the case for economic benefits to the NHS is not yet proven


The report concluded that effective management of long-term conditions has implications beyond the health and care system. It requires collaboration with other government providers, such as housing and transport services, to ensure that patients are properly supported.


Source PM Live http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/uk_nhs_needs_to_rethink_long-term_care_584158




UK NHS needs to rethink long-term care

Monday 7 July 2014

Leading health experts in NHS funding debate call

An NHS member of staff

Leading figures from the health world are calling for a national debate on how the NHS in England is funded.


In a letter to The Times, they say challenges from an ageing population mean the system is “creaking at the seams” and cannot continue as it is.


Signatories include the heads of the Royal College of Physicians and Royal College of Nursing.


The BBC’s health editor says the group feels future options may include higher taxes or charges for some treatment.


Without action an extra £30bn will be needed by 2020 to fund the NHS at current levels, their letter adds.


They are asking for a cross-party, independent conversation on the way forward for the “scope, provision and funding of health and social care”.


‘Holistic agreement’


The nine signatories say that in 50 years’ time, at least two-and-a-half times as many patients will suffer from multiple health problems.


BBC health editor Hugh Pym said while their letter is suggesting that further action is needed to make the NHS more efficient, this will not be enough as financial pressures intensify.


“The group is calling for a national debate on what it says are the options – higher taxes, payments for some elements of health care or a review is what is available on the NHS,” he added.


Their letter says: “The status quo is not an option. We are already seeing the signs of the system creaking at the seams.”


Warning that “business as usual won’t do”, they assert there needs to be “an honest, open dialogue between politicians and citizens”.


“We need a new settlement; a fundamental, holistic agreement with the country on what health and social care should be, how and where it is delivered to maximise the quality of care, and how it should be paid for.”


This “national conversation” should start now and be completed by the end of 2015, the letter concludes.


Two signatories – Ciaran Devane, chief executive of Macmillan Cancer Support, and Turning Point chief executive Lord Adebowale – are non-executive directors of NHS England.


It is also signed by: Sir John Oldham, who chaired the Independent Commission on Whole Person Care; Jeremy Hughes, chief executive of the Alzheimer’s Society; Peter Carter, chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing; Maureen Baker, chairwoman of the Royal College of GPs; Sir Richard Thompson, president of the Royal College of Physicians; Jean-Pierre van Besouw, president of the Royal College of Anaesthetists, and Chris Hopson, chief executive of the Foundation Trust Network.


Source BBC News http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-28189074



Leading health experts in NHS funding debate call

Friday 4 July 2014

EC unveils online pharmacies logo

Aims to protect patients from falsified medicines

online pharmacies logo

Patients in Europe who acquire drugs through the internet have a new safety measure to ensure they are using a trusted source in the form of a common logo for official online pharmacies.The European Commission (EC) has introduced the logo last week as part its Falsified Medicinal Products Directive to tackle the growing problem of fake medicines that pass themselves off as real authorised products.

Many of these fake drugs are sold via unofficial websites, and it is hoped the logo will help guide patients to regulated sites that use legally-operating suppliers.


“When buying medicines online, consumers must be aware that unless they buy from legally-operating online medicine suppliers, they run the risk of buying medicines that are falsified”, said European Commissioner for Health Tonio Borg.


“Falsified medicines can be ineffective, harmful or even deadly. The Commission has established a common logo for online pharmacies so consumers can stay safe.”


The logo uses a cross and four stripes of colour and will appear on the websites of legally operating online pharmacies in the EU. It will have the flag of the EU country where the online pharmacy was established, and text that will be translated into the official language/s of that country.


If the logo is genuine, clicking on it will take consumers to the national regulatory authority website, which lists all legally operating online pharmacies and other legally authorised retailers of medicines. They can then check that the pharmacy is listed, before continuing with their purchase.


The regulation will come into force in the next four to six weeks, although Member States have one year to prepare for its application, helped by a communication toolkit provided by the EC.


The logo beat out competition from another design after two potential logos were unveiled in 2012 as part of the falsified medicines legislation


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/ec_unveils_online_pharmacies_logo_581963




EC unveils online pharmacies logo

Thursday 3 July 2014

EC sets out its pharma priorities

New strategy puts the industry at the heart of Europe’s economic growth prospects, says EFPIA

EU flagGreater public-private co-operation, wider availability of orphan drugs and biosimilars and new research priorities are part of the European Commission’s (EC) new pharma strategy, which also recognises the industry’s ability to help drive the region’s economy.

The EC’s Pharmaceutical Industry: A Strategic Sector For The European Economy report describes the pharma industry as one of the “gems of European industry”, noting that the sector is “important for European public health, economic growth, trade and science”.


This importance can be seen in the numbers, with the EU pharma industry producing an output of €220bn during 2012, while employing around 800,000 people.


The EU was also the world’s major trader in medicines in 2013, although this could change as the global spend on medicines is expected to grow to nearly $1.17trn by 2017 and other regions continue to increase in importance.


With this in mind, a suitable strategy is “essential for the EU to maintain its competitive edge”, according to the EC, which used the report to identify the main healthcare challenges for the region.


These challenges include well-worn concerns, such as high R&D costs, issues related to intellectual property and increased global competition, as well as growing public health threats, such as antimicrobial resistance and the rise of global warming and related injuries and illnesses.


The document is partly based on the experiences of the Process on Corporate Responsibility in the Area of Pharmaceuticals, an initiative to develop and maintain a favourable environment in the EU for healthcare companies.


Specific actions mentioned in the latest report include setting priorities with regards to the development of new therapies and fostering public-private co-operation to ensure long-term sustainability of the industry.


The EC is also looking to facilitate the availability of orphan drugs and biosimilars and to build on efforts to improve transparency and ethical behaviour.


In its response, the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) said the strategy “positions the pharmaceutical industry at the heart of Europe’s economic growth prospects”.


The trade body’s director general Richard Bergström commented: “It is encouraging to see the European Commission’s acknowledgement of the importance and value the pharmaceutical industry brings to not just the health and wellbeing of citizens but also the economic wellbeing of nations.


“This paper is a positive step towards establishing the industry’s rightful position as a viable growth agent for Europe.”


EFPIA published its own thoughts on pharma’s role in EU healthcare reform just last month, also calling on the industry to be at “the heart of European economic reform and growth”.


The organisation used its Health & Growth – Working together for a healthy Europe report to call for deeper collaboration between industry, European institutions and governments and a new dialogue to deliver “improved health outcomes, within a sustainable financial framework and thriving healthcare and industrial ecosystem.”


Following the publication of the EC’s report, the Commission said it will organise an event in autumn 2014 to bring together decision makers across the EU to discuss potential policy decisions.


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/ec_sets_out_its_pharma_priorities_582127




EC sets out its pharma priorities

Tuesday 1 July 2014

Care.Data pilot to be limited to just 100 GP practices

HSCIC admits ‘pain’ of last 12 months but says health data has transformational potential

Kingsley Manning, HSCIC chair, speaking at OPEN Health's Big Ideas event

Plans to launch a pilot of the UK’s troubled patient data collection scheme later this year look set to be more limited than originally thought.NHS England wrote to Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in April outlining a proposal for a phased roll out of the GP data extraction process involving between 100 and 500 GP practices.

But the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) – which will support the programme and provide its technology framework – now says the numbers involved will be at the lowest end of that scale.


Speaking at OPEN Health’s Big Ideas event in London earlier this week, HSCIC chair Kingsley Manning said: “We will do a trial run of collecting data from 100 GP practices in the autumn, the technology is in place to do that and we’re confident of being able to do the interaction and the collection.


“On the basis of that trial run a decision will be made about [whether or not] to roll it out across the country as a whole at the end of this year or the beginning of next.”


Even the project’s “most enthusiastic critics actually believe it’s a good thing to do, they just don’t like the way it’s being done”, he added.


But, with some understatement, Manning acknowledged “it did spark, it has sparked and continues to spark a really quite excited response”.


The response saw Care.Data put on hold for six months after it attracted a barrage of criticism from medical and patient groups who argued that it was being rolled out too quickly.


“To some extent, it seems to me, that that response reflects as much as anything else a fundamental change in public attitudes and one that we have to be very, very conscious of,” said Manning. “It’s pretty obvious that part of the problem is that there’s a general loss of trust in public institutions.”


He added: “The last 12 months have been a pretty painful time. We need to recognise much of the criticism is valid; we have to be more transparent. Citizens have rights that are irritating and awkward, but that we have to honour.”


Nevertheless, Manning was bullish about the huge potential he sees in better use of healthcare information.


“The power of data, the power of technology to transform in a radical and fundamental fashion the way in which individuals live their lives, and how they manage their health, is potentially the best hope we have for sustaining the healthcare system.


“But it also offers a fundamental opportunity for higher quality of life, higher quality of existence.”


“Care.Data offers a depth, a richness of data that is unparalleled in almost any industrialised economy,” he said


The public’s trust, Manning said, was now a “transactional contract” and said there had to be a recognition of the need to “renegotiate the [data] contract with individuals”.


“We have to accept that the age of deference has gone and we have to develop trust in other ways – it’s about transparency and is clear that if you give people something of value they will agree [to their data being used],” he said.


Source PMLive http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/care.data_pilot_to_be_limited_to_just_100_gp_practices_580956




Care.Data pilot to be limited to just 100 GP practices

Test Post from Sollo Marcomms

Test Post from Sollo Marcomms http://sollomarcomms.com

Sollo Marcomms 1st test blog

test1..................